Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiang Yibing (performer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5: Creation by a sock of User:Mokezhilao. Primefac (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jiang Yibing (performer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 20-year-old actress with only 3 credits (according to the article), none with an article on en.wiki (or zh.wiki for the matter). All references are exactly the same PR release. Orphaned page. It appears that she is currently a Central Academy of Drama student, so she may have a very good acting career ahead of her, but even if you look past the promotional tone this is definitely a case of WP:TOOSOON.Timmyshin (talk) 21:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - There's not a whole lot of independent coverage, but the major portal Netease reports that she's the leading actress in the upcoming film "I'm a Cop". Seems notable. -Zanhe (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And is there any info that says "I'm a Cop" has begun filming? Or will be filmed? Who is the director? The article says it's an "Internet film". Timmyshin (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (not notable by any stretch of the imagination). Bearian (talk) 23:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The major portal Netease reports . -Renyuren (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are a confirmed sockpuppet. Timmyshin (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep As the leading actress in a coming film, she seems to be notable enough for inclusion. {MordeKyle} ☢ 23:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:MordeKyle That 163.com "report" is nothing more than a PR release, and there's no other information on that "film". Besides, the report says it's an "Internet film" which anybody can make. Timmyshin (talk) 08:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.