Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhimli Roy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jhimli Roy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON; no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:FILMMAKER. GSS ^💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 13:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't passes GNG. Setreis (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article and facts stated are supported by verifiable references from reliable, independent sources, official websites of different noted film events which are respected events in field of serious cinema, art & culture.Wowknowledge2 (talk) 09:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above (sock excluded) Spiderone 21:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete meets neither WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.