Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Care (Australia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Care (Australia)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:ORG as does not state why the organisation is notable. A quick Google search fails to bring up anything notable about the organisation either. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:54, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:54, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:54, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep are you sure you know how to use Google? It tailors results on location. In Australia there are plenty of references once you pass the first few pages which is taken up by their SEO. Jewish Care are an enormous organisation and central to the running of the Jewish community. They are widely reported in the Jewish press and sometimes in the mainstream as well. (Smellytap (talk) 08:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Smellytap is a CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet (or master) with a history of using multiple accounts in order to influence the outcome of AfDs. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC) .[reply]

Comment this message was put up when the article was only a stub, and understandably a bit thin on the ground. Since then I have had the opportunity to put some more detail into the article (UnicornLoz (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

UnicornLoz is a CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet of Smellytap. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The sources included in the article aren't necessarily the most reliable, however, there is substantial coverage and countless references to the organisation across the news media. Likely meets WP:ORGDEPTH. Kb.au (talk) 15:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable. Some book hits for instance - [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].Icewhiz (talk) 12:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.