Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Canada
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jet Canada[edit]
- Jet Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I think that this may be a hoax as the article was created by GraemeHerbert (talk · contribs), the same person as the CEO and founder. Also the article was created in 2009 but indicates that the airline was founded in 2005. I don't believe that almost four years later the airline was not in operation. These two versions of his user page are interesting. I was unable to find anything in Google, not always a good indication but useful, and the given external link, http://www.jetcanada.ca/, did not work when I tried it. At best it seems to be a nonexistent airline or failed attempt. Either way it should be deleted. something lame from CBW 12:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not a real airline, certainly. Perhaps an imaginary one rather than a malicious hoax, though. I can find no evidence that it was even a failed attempt. The domain jetcanada.ca is registered to a software company in Aurora, Ontario, and jetcanadainc.ca to someone in Australia. At one point, the creator blanked the page. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GraemeHerbert&oldid=279671622 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GraemeHerbert&oldid=259093070 for other imaginary airlines created by the same editor. – Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax. Hairhorn (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Eastmain's research. It seems a hoax.--Oakshade (talk) 16:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete at best it's WP:CRYSTAL. Mjroots (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a flight of fancy. Ahem, I mean fail WP:V. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As per everyone else. Advertising, WP:CRYSTAL. Addionne (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.