Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Flower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Toph Beifong. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 03:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jessie Flower[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not pass WP:NACTOR. Has a ton of notability tag on the article that remains unresolved. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Toph Beifong, her only main role so far, unless any justification to keep is put forward. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This person is WP:GNG the article needs sourcing and work which can be done. The fact is the subject is notable and the afd is not warranted. WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 23:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lubbad85, then add the sources. I can't find any and as said above Toph is her only main role. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am not interested in doing the work. But I can see the subject is notable. Lubbad85 (☎) 12:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lubbad85, then we can draftify it until someone comes along that is willing to fix it. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment I stick to my vote of "keep". WP:NOTCLEANUP and I do not think it is WP:TOOSOON I do not oppose draft...my opinion is that the subject is notable Lubbad85 (☎) 12:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)~~[reply]

Move to Draft after a brief search I agree with the nom WP:TOOSOON Lubbad85 (☎) 12:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. She fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. If she becomes notable, a redirect can be reversed. Poorly sourced BLPs of non-notable people are not good. wumbolo ^^^ 19:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wumbolo, redirect to Toph or draftify? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toph. wumbolo ^^^ 19:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.