Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Sporty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Salix (talk): 23:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jessica Sporty[edit]
- Jessica Sporty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Run-of-the-mill WP:BLP1E, woman gets news buzz for dating multiple men to get free dinners. An otherwise private person, non-celebrity, news coverage has completely fallen off the map, so no enduring notability. Just like the woman who walked into a pool while texting or a billion other 1E examples, there is no justification for the retention of this type of article. Tarc (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Otherwise private except for the interview she gave with Good Morning America. CallawayRox (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopedic tabloidery. WP:NOTNEWS. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that she seems to be a classic case of BLP1E, but this content could perhaps be usefully merged to an appropriate section of Match.com. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I WP:PRESERVED the article by merging it as proposed. CallawayRox (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And I have removed that nonsense from the match.com article. This was the action of an individual person who simply picked this particular dating website to do what she did. The match.com proprietors are not in any way responsible for this situation, and to my knowledge no reliable sources lay blame on them either. Tarc (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Does Online dating service meet your approval, o wise one? CallawayRox (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And I have removed that nonsense from the match.com article. This was the action of an individual person who simply picked this particular dating website to do what she did. The match.com proprietors are not in any way responsible for this situation, and to my knowledge no reliable sources lay blame on them either. Tarc (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I WP:PRESERVED the article by merging it as proposed. CallawayRox (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTNEWS is an understatement; going out on multiple dates to get free food and beverages isn't newsworthy in the least. And so she got interviewed on GMA; alot of people get an interview on that show, but it doesn't lock up Wiki-notability. Nate • (chatter) 04:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Yep, this is pretty much a textbook case of NOTNEWS, plain and simple.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.