Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Kingsley Publishers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Kingsley Publishers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article had tons of puffery in it, and it just feels like it's a corporate profile that was written with significant COI problems. The sources are VERY weak, and these are not within the standards expected to Wiki. As such, this should be deleted in accordance with Wiki policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkinspyce (talk • contribs) 20:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkinspyce (talk • contribs) 20:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, England, and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh thank you for fixing this for me. I could NOT figure out what part of the code was keyed wrong. Pumpkinspyce (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the sources are all fine. This meets WP:GNG. At worse this could be merged into John Murray Press, but I don't see the need. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems to meet WP:NCORP based on existing sources (van Goidsenhoven, Leni, The Bookseller, PW). While a minor edit pass could help it's not even a bad case of WP:PROMO. —siro χ o 07:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, widely & internationally known publisher of books on topics related to autism with numerous notable authors.--TempusTacet (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Probably redirect to Hachette UK, seems to be a sub-unit of that company now. [1] Oaktree b (talk) 14:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised that the nominator has characterised the sources in this way. For example, what is wrong with the van Goidsenhoven source? Phil Bridger (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.