Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Warn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sam Walton (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Warn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references provided do not establish this subject as notable. Most of the references are references to social media post, which generally are not reliable. CookieMonster755 (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. Jesse Warn is an award winning director and cinematographer and more than deserves an article on Wikipedia. LLArrow (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LLArrow, than please establish him as notable. CookieMonster755 (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know not, to which you speak. Firstly, Jesse Warn is of the male persuasion. Secondly, I just established him as notable in my previous response. The article itself is a meta establishment of notability. LLArrow (talk) 17:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter and Instagram is most always not a reliable source. CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When the source is a verified account, it is perfectly acceptable. LLArrow (talk) 05:55, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're mistaken, LLArrow, social media are not sources to establish notability. They may be used, rarely, to establish facts, only. Kraxler (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not claiming that the sources given establish notability, I'm claiming that that they are reliable and verifiable. I'm done debating this idiotic attempt of deletion. I have seen numerous other articles on Wikipedia that are far less notable than Jesse Warn. Good day, LLArrow (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use the ~~OTHER CRAP EXIST~~ OTHER STUFF EXIST argument. Thanks. CookieMonster755 (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop this vendetta you have against this director, and start pursuing something worthwhile. LLArrow (talk) 05:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although the use of "crap" seems to be somewhat harsh for an award-winning artist(usually this guideline is refered to as WP:OTHERSTUFF (there's also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS), there's no vendetta going on here. To question the notability of anybody is run-of-the-mill routine procedure at AfD. Instead of insisting that Warn is notable because you know it, you should follow our guidelines and show that he is notable. See WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG and argue, please. Kraxler (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will not devote one more second of my life to this frivolous debate. Good day. LLArrow (talk) 01:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is the main means of deciding how to proceed here at Wikipedia. To refuse to take part in discussions, especially because you know that you're right but it is beneath your dignity to tell us why, is an unhelpful and counterproductive attitude. You're not required to discuss further, but the closer of this debate isn't required to close it as "keep" either. Kraxler (talk) 23:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy a nice pile of passive aggressiveness, so I thank you for that. However I have a life that Wikipedia factors into in the most minimalistic of ways, which doesn't lend well to leading noble charges for every Tom, Dick and Harry that I happen to have ample respect and admiration for. Cheers, LLArrow (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has won two and has been nominated for two other New Zealand Film and TV Awards. Satisfies WP:ANYBIO. — Yash! ^(Y) 04:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He won at the 2000 Nokia New Zealand Film Awards the award for Best Script, Short Film; and apparently another award in the short film categories in 1999. Was nominated twice, but did not win, at the 2003 New Zealand Film Awards for Best Direstor and Best Screenplay of Nemesis Game. Kraxler (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:ANYBIO. The New Zealand Film Awards satisfies the requirement as a major award. —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.