Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Krnčević

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Krnčević[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ATHLETE. has not played in the highest professional league in Australia A League. his European stints are not top tier either. LibStar (talk) 06:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. –BuickCentury Driver 13:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes it fails WP:ATH but it is a well-sourced article and arguments can be made from articles in major newspapers that he might pass the GNG. There's a lot of low-hanging fruit to hit with football biographies. I don't think this needs to be one of them. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Keb25 (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 00:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails both WP:NFOOTBALL (hasn't played in a fully-pro league) and WP:GNG (what limited coverage there is simply run-of-the-mill sports reports, nothing "significant"). Giant Snowman 00:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Week Delete - Fails the "not fit for purpose" WP:NFOOTBALL, however the one theage.com.au report is coverage (and not IMO WP:ROUTINE as claimed by GiantSnowman), but on it's own is not "significant", if other coverage turns up then willing to reconsider. Mtking (talk) 06:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NSPORTS#Association football and WP:GNG. Four sentences saying basically "son of famous father about to make debut in semi-pro league, manager says he has promise and has to start somewhere" can't by any stretch of the imagination be considered anything other than routine sports reporting. Recreate if the FourFourTwo gossip-column stuff comes to anything and he plays in the A-League. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Life^talk 12:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.