Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Kornblum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jesse Kornblum[edit]
- Jesse Kornblum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing a nomination started by an IP editor. The following is the nomination rationale given on the article talk page: Nominated for deletion. This article is an autobiography of a non-notable living individual with unverified biographical content. --209.6.234.82 (talk) 21:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC) . At this time, I have no opinion. Whpq (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He has some publications with double-digit citations in Google scholar, but that's not enough for WP:PROF#C1. And I found a Computerworld story quoting him as an expert but there's not really anything in it about him as a person, so I don't see much basis for passing WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sounds like a useful guy to have around. Nice-looking goat. Won Naval Acadamy Computer Science Department "Top Geek" award in 2003. However, can't really find anything written about him. Being really good at a difficult and important job is not enough. He would fall under WP:PROF if anything, I guess, but he doesn't seem to pass that, as near as I can tell. Fails [WP:BIO]] generally. Herostratus (talk) 02:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Herostratus. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.