Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesper Öhrvall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesper Öhrvall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another in a string of non-notable teenage hockey players who fail to meet WP:NHOCKEY, with no evidence of passing the GNG, and where the article incorrectly asserts that the subject has played in the SHL. Subject, like the others recently AfDed, played only in a single exhibition game, which does not qualify for NHOCKEY's Criterion #1. Ravenswing 02:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, does not meet WP:NHOCKEY or GNG. Played 1 game for HV71 in the European Trophy tournament not the Swedish Hockey League.ÞórrÓðinnTýr ^Eh? 02:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails NHOCKEY, GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Resolute (talk • contribs)
Delete Doesn't meet GNG and fails NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.