Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerzy Miller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The disambiguation issue has been manually dealt with by Materialscientist, and the new target article is unambiguously notable. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jerzy Miller[edit]

Jerzy Miller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a true DAB, because there's only one Jerzy Miller at this point. The other is a redlink. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Please don't move a page this way during an AfD, it is confusing for other editors and means we can't see the previous dab page, work out whether the red link needed a blue link, etc. But if you do move a page, please tidy up the incoming links - I've fixed those in two templates: {{Ministers of the Interior of Poland}} and {{Donald Tusk Cabinet}}. PamD 15:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this is very confusing. It looks like the argument revolved around https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=Jerzy+Miller&timestamp=20230116080120 and in turn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Jerzy_Miller_(poet) which is empty, so the MOS:DABRL standard isn't met. However, pl:Jerzy Miller indicates more possibly notable people, and a lack of primary topic there, so maybe this issue merits more investigation by Polish editors. --Joy (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some action was taken apparently but it is still tagged for an AFD discussion so we need to close this discussion on the current page and no opinions have been expressed about whether this article should be Kept, Redirected, Merged or Deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.