Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry McAuley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is clear consensus the subject of the article meets criterion #3 of the notability guideline for biographies, supported by additional sources which have been identified. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry McAuley[edit]

Jerry McAuley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the rescue mission maybe notable, it does not appear that this individual passes WP:ANYBIO Graywalls (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. He has an entry in the Dictionary of American Biography,[1] thus unambiguously passes WP:ANYBIO #3. Spicy (talk) 09:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Jeremiah McAuley." Dictionary of American Biography, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1936. Gale In Context: Biography, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/BT2310008051/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=0763e1bf
  • Keep per Spicy, the article is poorly referenced, but there are further sources online. TSventon (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I would encourage you to take the time to incorporate these sources and improve the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ 01:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.