Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerred Price

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jerred Price[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a WP:G11 request on this as I don't think it's unambiguous spam (it looks to me like a fairly generic local politician bio). I'm not convinced however that either his musical or his political career is significant enough to justify Wikipedia hosting a biography—there are a lot of sources but on a quick dip it seems to mainly be routine coverage of local council decisions rather than about him specifically. ‑ Iridescent 05:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Politicians, and Tennessee. ‑ Iridescent 05:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with Iridescent. The page looks quite neutral (a fairly written bio yet requires solid citations). However, could be improved in various ways. I've gone through multiple links that are quite significant to justify his presence on Wikipedia. A more expert opinion than mine is required here. Mr.aunali (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hyper-local politician fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 22:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the very definition of a hyper local politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Strictly WP:ROTM coverage. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For the field he is in, coverage seems routine. Fails to meet WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. In an optimistic light it could be possibly WP:TOOSOON. NiklausGerard (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.