Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerramie Domish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jerramie Domish[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable article from a creator who it appears was on a mission to promote the Coventry Blaze.18abruce (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, players like Jerramie used to meet NHOCKEY as the league used to be considered a top professional league for NHOCKEY so its not that out of wack that it got created. -DJSasso (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This clearly fails notability. To Djsasso's note, perhaps the English league in question may have passed muster, but I would never have considered them as top tier. I think given the state of UK ice hockey, one must rely on national team inclusion to reach top tier status, even though he raises a valid point. I think that the 'back door' to notability here would be if the drug issue became a noteworthy issue. Thankfully, to date. that's also a fail. Bill McKenna (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.