Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeroen Tel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 02:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeroen Tel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite all the refs, I can find nothing that speaks to notability. Plenty of (self made ?) videos on YouTube and similar but nothing reputable and independent that talks about him. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are now some references on the article to third-party sources (Tel Me More received coverage in the technology/gaming press). Many refs are non-English-language but they're still valid. Colapeninsula (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm puzzled as to why you don't think the Next Generation article I added a year ago qualifies as "reputable and independent". Anyway, we have at least the bare minimum of notable/reliable sources in the article, and given that Tel is one of the most prolific composers on the Commodore 64 scene I'd be shocked if there weren't a lot more out there. For starters, surely Retro Gamer has done a feature on C64 music by now?--Martin IIIa (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep barely notable via coverage. Dloh cierekim 00:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.