Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jericho Summer (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and given that it keeps getting re-created and swiftly re-deleted, I'm going to salt it this time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jericho Summer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the third AfD for this subject and, as far as I can tell, it still does not meet the notable standards of WP:NBAND and WP:ORG. The sources cited in the article are very weak, or fail WP:RS entirely. - Mr X 19:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete WP:G4 + Salt - Article recreated after it was deleted following an AfD discussion. Exemplo347 (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jericho Summer were listed on a country's official charts which is one of the listing on the notable criteria, there are many other media links, more than some other listings on wikipedia infact userrivalmanic 12.48, 15 January (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivalmanic (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only chart mentioned in this article (the UK New Releases Chart) isn't mentioned in the article about the Official Charts Company which publishes the British music charts. Thus, it doesn't seem to be a major chart that should qualify an artist for an article under WP:BAND criterion #2. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The new release chart is a sub heading of the official UK charts, still a chart. extract from wiki notability.Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. This certainly seems to qualify with the number of independent links. Rivalmanic 19.50 UTC 26.01.17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivalmanic (talk • contribs) 17:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're the creator of this article so you may not be totally unbiased in your views. I can assure you that the "UK New Releases Chart" is merely a sub-page on the Official Charts Company website that doesn't even list the songs in any sort of order - go and take a look - and therefore doesn't add to Notability for Wikipedia's purposes. I hope this clears that point up. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Light2021 (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.