Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Tucker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Tucker[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: the references currently in the article are an interview (NSFW) and two award rosters. Mr. Tucker's industry awards don't count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. I looked for new sources and found only one mention in the cast list of a pornographic film[1]. Cheers, gnu 57 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable pronographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Those porn award wins would not have counted even when PORNBIO was in force. References consist of an interview at a porn vendor's site and two award winners lists at the award ceremonies' sites. Independent searches for RS coverage found nothing. No good references = no supported claim of notability per WP:BASIC or WP:ENT. • Gene93k (talk) 10:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: a non-notable pronographic performer. --NL19931993 (talk) 13:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:43, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.