Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Tai Abbett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Tai Abbett[edit]

Jeremy Tai Abbett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. "Creative evangelist of Google" is a largely meaningless title that is likely puffed-up by the subject; I don't see any independent references that use it or suggest it has any importance. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 02:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A couple of interviews and profile-type bio blurbs do not constitute significant coverage in reliable sources. --Kinu t/c 19:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete sources are not independent and reliable or are self-writing.Kamran Ali El-Batli (talk) 08:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.