Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Quin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Quin[edit]

Jeremy Quin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece for non-notable political candidate per WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, just the usual brief local coverage every candidate gets just before the May elections in the UK. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. WP:TOOSOON at best. Boleyn (talk) 14:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as he fails WP:POLITICIAN. The article can be restored and improved if he is elected to Parliament. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • As yet unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot make a properly sourced case that he was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article before he became a candidate, then he has to win the election, not merely run in it, to become notable enough. Delete, without prejudice against recreation if he wins the seat. Bearcat (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:POLITICIAN and is case of WP:TOOSOON would be notable only if he is elected.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.