Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Jenkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Jenkins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable journalist. Searching for sources results in zero significant reliable coverage. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:GNG Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all sources are linked to him (his webpage, facebook page etc.). Beyond this he has not clearly held any full-time broadcast journalist positions. Even if he had, it would probably start out as local ones that would not make him notable. Very few 23-year-old broadcast journalists are notable, and Jenkins does not appear to be an exception to that truth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.