Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Holmes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Holmes[edit]

Jeremy Holmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article on this academic and psychotherapist currently has three references. One is a book review with no information about the subject of the article apart from verifying his profession. The second is an interview. The third is a publisher's page about one of his books. This isn't significant coverage in reliable sources so I'm doubtful about his notability. Page has been tagged as needing more citations since 2010; WP:BEFORE has not found me anything to add. One of his books won the Goethe Award for Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Scholarship, so it's possible that book is notable. Holmes himself, per the publisher's page, has won the Bowlby-Ainsworth Award, but that does not have a wiki article. Tacyarg (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Peripheral Visions': A Conference Celebrating the Contribution of Jeremy Holmes and 20 Years of Psychoanalytic Studies at Exeter University, UK By: Hepworth, Mary, British Journal of Psychotherapy, 02659883, , Vol. 35, Issue 2
The article says very little about him biographically and hopefully could be much improved if those kinds of sources could be found. In addition, there is much room to include information on the impact of his work. That may require subject expertise to do him justice. Lamona (talk) 03:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw as nom, others have made good points, thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.