Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Cathey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Cathey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, not referenced to any strong reliable source coverage about him, of a filmmaker with no strong claim to passing WP:CREATIVE. The notability claim here is that he was one of 11 winners of an amateur filmmaking award from his local film festival for a three-minute short film, and the source for that is a mere blurb which mentions his name while failing to actually be about him, and the only other "reference" here is his own self-published YouTube profile. None of this, neither the sourcing nor the substance, is valid grounds for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 06:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find significant coverage, and agree that isn't a claim to Wiki-notability here. Mortee (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Objection. Valid source from The Seattle Times newspaper cited to improve the article as well as to add a meaningful contribution to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmarshmallowz (talk • contribs) 04:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC) — Zmarshmallowz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

A person does not automatically qualify for a Wikipedia article just because one source for it exists in their local newspaper. A person qualifies for a Wikipedia article by having a broad range of coverage in a variety of newspapers, not just the moment they have one piece of coverage in an exclusively local context. Bearcat (talk) 19:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 20:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability. WP:1E. _{Vermont | reply here} 22:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for not passing WP:Creative. Alex (Talk) 20:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.