Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Buff
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jeremy Buff[edit]
- Jeremy Buff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject is non-notable; blatant self-promotion -adavidw (talk) 19:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although this could have been speedied. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 19:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article as stands reeks of vanity. Very little on google news to assert notability (especially since the subjece should have been covered in the news during the recent political campaigns). Themfromspace (talk) 19:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I have to wonder why these autobiographers make it so blatantly obvious that they're writing about themselves.--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, I can smell the stench of vanity from way over here, from across the room. My secretary is typing this comment in for me in fact. JBsupreme (talk) 08:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. COI stench is overpowering. --Oscarthecat (talk) 11:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.