Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Broomfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Broomfield[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While most everything in this article can be verified (albeit through lower-quality sources such as blogs and his own webpages), I don't think this article meets the notability test. His first album was self-released and made no splash, the second hasn't even been independently released, and the only reviews of his writings and blogs are on other blogs. A few comics were published in a short-lived literary review magazine, "Backwards City Review"[1], but I don't think that's enough. ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, insufficient reliable sources independent of the subject to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. J04n(talk page) 02:59, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I searched a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but was not able to find any sources that would help support WP:N notability. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.