Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Godby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremiah Godby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to be a non-notable runner who promotes "natural medicine" by running across the country. There are a few mentions in small, local newspapers from 2011. The current article has a very promotional tone that is derived mostly from self-published sources close to the subject. At best, notability is due to one event. Delta13C (talk) 12:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A non-notable BLP with many unsourced claims. It looks like an advert. QuackGuru (talk) 09:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- if the sources currently used on the article form the extent of what is available, then this one really does fall below any reasonable threshold. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable, fluffy, promotional. Drmies (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I've gone through and trimmed some of the promotional content but the page remains mostly usnourced. Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.