Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Wright

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♠ 02:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Wright[edit]

Jennifer Wright (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A author who I can't quite find if she is notable or not. She does not appear to be that much to me, but I will see what others think. Wgolf (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It appears to me that the subject's strongest claim to notability is being an Editor at Large for Harper's Bazaar. I don't know that that is shoo-in for notability, however. signed, Rosguill talk 23:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment-Might be a redirect. BTW I have found at least one other person with this name (no surprise), an actress from the 50s, so if it survives any page linked to her that is some film should be renamed to Jennifer Write (actress). Back on topic though, I do think a redirect for now could be the best if not a delete. Wgolf (talk) 23:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think that being Editor at Large for Harper's Bazaar could be described as playing a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known collective body of work. Her books have articles about them - those articles aren't great, but they do have a few reviews as references, so her independent work has received some critical attention - I think we can manage to get her over WP:NAUTHOR.GirthSummit (blether) 15:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment-well as I said it is a bit tough to find info with someone like her as she has a very common name. If more info can be found though....Wgolf (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.