Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Parker (Back to the Future)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Parker (Back to the Future)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements for a stand alone article. Yes she is beautiful, but that is not a reason to create an article. Martin451 (talk) 02:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the show list of characters. As it stands, unreferenced fancruft. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (not merge). The article is a verbatim copy from the list of characters article without anything new short of the article wrapping parts, thus we're not losing anything with a delete, and the title is not a reasonable search term. The character herself has little notability for a standalone article. --MASEM (t) 03:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The character does not have a major role in the trilogy (it could very easily work well without her) and the entry for her in List of Back to the Future characters is more than enough. -- Lyverbe (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Masem and Lyverbe. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 00:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete since it is just a cut/paste and Jennifer Parker already redirects to the entry in the list of BttF characters. So... SNOW? Jclemens (talk) 03:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per previously stated arguments. Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.