Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer M. Adams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer M. Adams[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass the GNG as a nominee to be the United States Ambassador to Cape Verde. Appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Let'srun (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women. Let'srun (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm fully aware that just because she's a diplomat doesn't mean she's automatically notable. However, being a United States ambassador in general carries more significance and thus is notable. And I respectfully disagree with the notion that it's too soon; other United States ambassadors, both current ones and and those from long ago, have had articles when they were nominees too and were continually updated through their tenures.

That being said, if the consensus isn't to keep it, can it at the very least be moved into a draft? That way, I can work on it and simply move it back to the mainspace once she's confirmed by the Senate. Losipov (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be open to that option. Let'srun (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete completely fails WP:GNG and we do not preference ambassadors from particular countries here. SportingFlyer T·C 21:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per suggestion made in above comments by Losipov. Agree with Let'srun and SportingFlyer that the subject presently falls short of passing WP:GNG/WP:NPOL. Sal2100 (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Sal2100 (talk) 16:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Let'srun I didn't notice it before, but I've now seen you have nominated dozens of articles for deletion, including judicial nominees and beauty pageant contestants. Several editors have expressed their concerns about these moves, and now I see it too. In the case of judicial nominees, you've been saying that those articles are also "too soon". Remember, more sources can be added as time goes on and they will likely have more sources after they've been confirmed. It's the same thing with ambassadors.

You didn't even consider that this article be made into a draft until I suggested it, but rather straight up deleted. Respectfully, I find it a bit inappropriate. And the article Draft:Ann M. Yastishock wasn't even considered problematic before and you moved it to a draftspace. I'm at a loss honestly. Losipov (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify until such time as she's confirmed. Star Mississippi 02:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.