Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sky Sports. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jenna Brooks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CREATIVE as a journalist. Almost all the sources i found were from her employer sky sports and the coverage is very limited where she is the subject of coverage. LibStar (talk) 15:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable TV journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge into Sky Sports. Other commentators and journalists are variously referred to throughout the article. Not sufficient notability for separate article. Aoziwe (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.