Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenevive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 05:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jenevive[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable musician: all I could find about her online are a few artist profiles, lyrics pages, and apparently a Kickstarter page. Not much specifically about her. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

c Not sure if this is the way I should respond, but there are a few references up and I'm working on getting more up, do not delete the page. Wiki is being policed way too hard and is lowering the appeal of this platform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StephanieLloyd (talk • contribs) 06:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely this is how to do it. This is where the resolution will be made as to whether the article should stay or go, so any input you have will be most likely to be noticed here. Also, any and all input you can provide is valuable. Good luck! Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC

c It appears that a quick judgement for deletion was made based on a small amount of information that had been posted at the beginning stages of building the page and a call for deletion was made five min into creating the Wikipedia page for Jenevive before all of the information had been posted. The final version of the page had not been completed and posted until later after the need for deletion had been decided. It is in my opinion that the completed page for Jenevive meets the minimum criteria to remain posted on Wikipedia.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.