Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemima Abey
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Rlendog (talk) 14:41, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jemima Abey[edit]
- Jemima Abey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined PROD. The individual does not meet the notability requirements of WP:ENT, specifically she has not "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions"). A role on Eastenders is mentioned in the article, however the role consisted of three episodes in 2006. I also did a Google news and full LexisNexis check for coverage prior to PRODing the article and could not find any significant coverage in reliable sources that would qualify her for inclusion under general notability guidelines. This actress may well be on her way to meeting notability criteria, but I don't see that she's there yet. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Probably more relevant the the Eastenders role is a significant role in Hex, appearing in 13 episodes, and As If, appearing in 5 episodes. All in all I felt this was an unsuitable prod candidate due to these roles.--Michig (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep looks like a borderline case to be sure, but I'd say the work described above and in the article just counts as the required work to meet WP:ENT. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.