Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Royal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Royal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a living person, largely written by the subject himself, with the sole reference being a broken link to his CV. I can't find any better sources or anything to suggest the subject meets WP:NBIO or WP:PROF. – Joe (talk) 13:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 13:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 13:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Searches for Jeffrey G Royal (there is a different Jeffrey Royal there too) on Google Scholar are here: (Jeffrey Royal publications indexed by Google Scholar) I have no ablity to judge if the citation count is acceptable or too low. I'm neutral for the moment Fiddle Faddle 13:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete creating an article on oneself is clearly and deliberately against Wikipedia policies, and we need to stop tolerating such disruptive behavior.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. His citation record is thin even for a low-citation field, and perusing other biographies of archaology, the field doesn't appear to be particularly low-citation. So no WP:NPROF C1. I don't think the RPM institute is large or well-established enough for WP:NPROF C7. I don't see any other signs of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.