Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Nicholas Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:09, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Nicholas Brown[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has effectively been completely unsourced since its creation in 2010 (IMDb is WP:NOTRS). Subject almost certainly doesn't clear WP:NACTOR, and doesn't look to meet WP:BASIC either. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and no redirect. I agree with IJBall. Not notable for an article. Passing mentions on some references I looked at but I couldn't find any in-depth coverage. A redirect to an article about one of his projects involved in not really feasible as none have any significant information about the actor. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing is not even close to reliable level. One is IMDb, which aims to include everything, which is not our goal, and the other is the subjects own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article does not pass any sort of notability {N, ANYBIO, GNG, or ACTOR).-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete Lacks the coverage needed to meet the GNG and also fails to meet WP:NACTOR.Sandals1 (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.