Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Landman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against a redirect, although not sure the utility is so great. Dennis - 2¢ 16:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Landman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A former child actor who has just been in 1 film-I think a link to the movie be the best IMO. Wgolf (talk) 02:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 08:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:AUTO, WP:NOTE. when a 2-sentence new article Jeffrey Landman appears with complete and specific detail like the completely-unknown actor's birthdate and hometown (an actor who worked once and only once --25 years ago!) AND the article's original writer is named Jeffman52001, we have a Prima facie case for AUTOBIOGRAPHY. having one role, ever, as: "a child actor... his first and only roll in the 1989 horror film Halloween... as Billy Hill, the friend of Jamie Lloyd, who is at the clinic with them" is not notable or newsworthy. including the name in the Cast section of the particular movie (where it already appears) is sufficient. Cramyourspam (talk) 17:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect – To Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers should be sufficient. ShoesssS ^Talk 13:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only gets an IMDb listing, not enough to meet notability Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.