Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey L. Kessler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey L. Kessler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough notability shown. Artem Karimov (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article is written in a puffy style, but Kessler is a very well-known lawyer: just Google <Kessler NFLPA> and look at the results--his name is not just in lots of articles, it's sometimes in the headline.[1][2][3]. The flackery could be reduced, but deletion is not appropriate here.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:02, 12 April 2011 (UTCer
Yes, the headlines of blog posts and other pages that cannot be used as a reliable source. Artem Karimov (talk) 14:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Requires cleanup, not deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtbobwaysf (talk • contribs) 2011-04-12T21:19:05
Keep as meeting my standards for notability of attorneys. The subject is partner in a major law firm, has argued significant cases, lead lawyer for a newsworthy case [4], etc. he also easily passes WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 21:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that apart from small mentions in the news article there have not been any real coverage of Kessler's bio. Artem Karimov (talk) 14:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.