Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Lawson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff Lawson[edit]
- Jeff Lawson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not particularly notable martial arts fighter. Oscarthecat (talk) 22:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What guidelines does he not meet? Why do you think the term non-notable applies? Did you try to find sources before nominating? Your nomination answers none of these questions even though it should.- Mgm|(talk) 23:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Most likely fails WP:ATHLETE, unless anyone can provide a source to back up his "professional" level. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 23:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - if this is deleted, the title should probably be turned into a redirect to Geoff Lawson as a viable search term. Grutness...wha? 00:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Comment' It was not difficult to find references and only a few minutes to wikify the article. jmcw (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep listed as pro on sherdog, so will pass WP:ATHLETE could do with expansion --Nate1481 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep based on claim that he is fighting at a professional level. JJL (talk) 15:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.