Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Duyn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Duyn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet the 'professor test' on WP:NACADEMIC. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 19:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of evidence of independent achievement. Some high cites on GS on a super-hot topic: functional MRI. Part of a large team. Can't find any single-author papers that would indicate independent achievement WP:Too soon. This is a case where high cites don't lead to a pass of WP:Prof. BLP is atrociously written, was created by an spa blocked account. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 03:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 17:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't pass guidelines for academics. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence he's gotten tenure. Bearian (talk) 01:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.