Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Boss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Boss[edit]

Non-notable kook that ran for president. Only one reliable source. Peephole (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete until he gets elected or more than a handful of votes. Stifle (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Ray (talk) 14:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Ray (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ray (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. -- Ray (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I thought it was pretty impressive that there are more than 7,000 Google hits on "jeff boss", and the first dozen or so are all about our afd candidate, but beware, the search also picks up many hits on the common phrase "jeff's boss". Kestenbaum (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nom. Kittybrewster ☎ 16:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and WP:POLITICIAN. JohnCD (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included on User:Peephole/911TMCruft#Conspiracy_AfD's. Ikip (talk) 03:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Userfy to User:Greenguy89/Jeff Boss so the creator can clean up and find more references. Ikip (talk) 04:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Duran (talk) 07:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Userfy. Added a few more sources showing he actually got a bit of independent coverage... so there's more now than just one. May be shaky for WP:POLITICIAN, but seems to approach WP:GNG for his determination. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment inre WP:POLITICIAN: "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article." His coverage seems to be tweaking that bar. It may be safe to presume that he will get more coverage and not less. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.