Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet hakam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jeet hakam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this passes GNG or the notability criteria for musicians. The person appears to have only self-released material on youtube, and internet searches reveal his youtube channel and facebook page. He does not appear to have received substantial third-party coverage. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 11:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sign of notability. Fails WP:PEOPLE & WP:MUSBIO. Europa man (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real claim to notability. FailsWP:MUSBIO.Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.