Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeebsion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeebsion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 03:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:BIO. Woogee (talk) 06:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Probably asserts enough to pass speedy, and from what I can tell he's a real self-promoter, but I cannot find any independent reliable-source coverage of him. (BTW, some of his stuff, e.g., here, is actually pretty good.) Glenfarclas (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails notability.--Karljoos (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this photographer. Joe Chill (talk) 21:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the above, does not meet WP:BIO standards. RFerreira (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.