Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeannie Elias

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeannie Elias[edit]

Jeannie Elias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't demonstrate any notability. Fails WP:GNG. OceanHok (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Film, Television, and Video games. OceanHok (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete Voice roles in Dennis the Menace, Leapfrog Adventures, a guest shot on McGuyver in the 80s are the highlights. Most of films or TV shows she was don't score higher than 50% or so on Rotten Tomatoes. None of which is notable. Far off from GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Note that I removed five pages of credits as unsourced shortly before this nomination, that earlier version can be seen here. Looks like Elias probably doesn't meet the "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows" of WP:NACTOR, with even IMDB's "known for" section listing only minor roles. Belbury (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Canada. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As always, actresses are not automatically notable just because the article contains (contained, in this case) a list of roles nominally verified by an IMDb profile — the notability of an actress hinges on the amount of reliable source coverage that can be shown about her acting, such as profiles of her, reviews of her roles which single her performance out for dedicated attention, properly sourced verification that she won or was nominated for a major national acting award, and on and so forth. It's not "has had roles", in other words — every actor has always had roles, because that's the job description — it's "gets over WP:GNG on substantive coverage about her and her roles. But that is and was absent here. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I think the subject meets the second limb of WP:NACTOR—that is, she has worked prolifically as a voice actress. There are lots of hits at newspapers.com. I don't know if they will make out WP:GNG, but the SNG appears to be made out, and only one need be met. I will try and get some articles from newspapers.com clipped. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I've now requested a selection of articles from newspapers.com to be clipped. I should have them within the next few hours. Thanks, Dflaw4 (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting but I see no new content added to the article that could establish SNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Currently the roles are IMO extremely minor for WP:NACTOR, the article is a poorly sourced WP:BLP and my search mainly found trivial mentions, therefore IMO WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC are probably failed. However, @Dflaw4: has stated there might be a list of plausible sources identified at resources exchange. Dflaw4, were you able to access the sources? You stated that I should have them within the next few hours, at the time I'm writing this two days has passed, could you still access the clippings at resources exchange? If so, could you please link those here and ping me so that I can have a look if it is possible? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 02:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unless significance or significance coverage can be shown by {u|Dflaw4}} search. My search did not show any results meeting the required standard. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 08:51, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.