Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne Jo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Jo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist who doesn't quite meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. She certainly has been active but there's a definite lack of reliable, in-depth coverage in third-party sources to build an adequate biographical article. Pichpich (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This case is similar to that of Christel Miller: a person billed as a filmmaker who has not actually made any notable films. She has a book, co-written with another person, but that is held by only 2 institutions. Almost all the sources are web ephemera, with the exception of a piece in the Reno Gazette-Journal on an exhibit she helped to organize in 2010, which is also actually the subject of the aforementioned book. Article is among several created by a new user in the last week that are either in AfD or PROD, so this is likely to be not much more than a fan page. Agricola44 (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 11:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. There's no coverage here. Also, this is one of several articles created by a group of editors that concerns films and people within a certain group of people or a certain company.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. In addition to the bit of real coverage for her Reno show, noted above, a work of hers got mentioned in The Washington Post[1], and her resume reflects a lot of (apparently minor) awards and participation in exhibitions at notable art institutions[2], but so far we haven't seen (and I couldn't find) enough coverage to support an article. She is apparently still in school at USC[3]. I would not be surprised to see more coverage eventually; right now, it's WP:TOOSOON. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:ACADEMIC. Bleubeatle (talk) 07:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. In analysis, it is seen that her minimal film career fails WP:ENT.[4] She being a PhD "candidate" who has lectured overseas fails WP:ACADEMIC. However, there might be a way to save this under WP:ARTIST for her numerous exhibitions,[5] but even there sourcing looks pretty sparse.[6] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The only good sources identified so far are the Reno Gazette-Journal and Washington Post stories. The Reno one is pretty in-depth but the Post one isn't, and I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- notice of her work has only gone slightly beyond what one would expect for a filmmaker at this stage of her career and comparing to the wider field of academic filmmakers is far too soon. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 23:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources to showcase notability are available; she also does not to meet the academic notability guidelines. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find any reliable sources pointing the person's notability. TheStrike Σagle 04:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.