Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Fallacara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Fallacara[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entrepreneur, clearly fails GNG, all signs of undisclosed paid editing. Chrisalder (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and France. Shellwood (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not even explained why this person is known for the book. Very much marketing page. If there are links that are in-depth about book and about him, it can change also. But delete at this moment. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't find any independent & reliable sources related to this person. Admittedly his area is a bit niche (bio-hacking) but we would still need RS. He appears to have purchased, or become executive of, some of the magazines in this area, so check "about" and "staff" when reviewing sources. Lamona (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – seems a notable individual in his niche field (in which he has founded organizations, later got listed, and has done research work along with a book). KP Mogensen (talk) 14:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User:KP Mogensen is undisclosed paid creator of this page. Chrisalder (talk) 06:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per KP Mogensen. --Vaco98 (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He is a possible sock of KP Mogensen, opening sock puppet investigation against him. Chrisalder (talk) 06:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He has 2 pages of hits in Google, the first of which is almost all PR stuff, some from PR.com. Nothing else found; zero hits in Scholar, JSTOR and the New York Times. If he was that notable, I'd expect to see something in a peer-reviewed journal. Oaktree b (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.