Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Claude Bigué
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jean-Claude Bigué[edit]
- Jean-Claude Bigué (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is very poorly sourced -- just a single external link to an interview with this and one other person. google:Jean-Claude Bigué yields nothing but primary sources. The fact of having founded a bank would surely establish notability if the bank were notable, but google:Belmont Private Bank yields nothing of interest, and perhaps more significantly, searching for the French name of the bank used in the fr:Jean-Claude Bigué article, google:Banque Privée Belmont yields nothing either. Both this article and the French equivalent were created by SPAs. The article is highly promotional. It's difficult to escape the conclusion that there's a lot of COI in all this. --Stfg (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:29, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:29, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 23:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Bondegezou (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTPROMOTION. Miniapolis (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.