Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaynez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator‎. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Jaynez[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed because of an old PROD from 2007 (why isn't there a statute of limitations on that?), but my reasoning still applies. As I said, there is "No appearance of notability beyond maybe the Native American Music Awards, though those are themselves questionable (see their page)". QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New Mexico. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A simple, quick search online reveals that he won a Grammy Award in 2005 and meets GNG. I've added a few citations and some content; more improvements can be made. It seems that the nominator might not have performed a WP:BEFORE. Netherzone (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said in my removal of it just now, that's not a Grammy Award which exists and the source was confusing it with the Native American Music Award (aka the Nammy) which is already mentioned. Notice the same source getting it right in the other article of theirs you added: "Jaynez, who last year won the Native American Music Award for best new artist" from an article dated in 2005. You accuse me of not performing a BEFORE (which I did, don't be ridiculous) and yet you didn't bother to check Grammy Award for Best New Artist#2000s to confirm who won in 2005 (It was Maroon 5 and Jaynez wasn't even nominated).

I appreciate your effort finding and adding those sources. Personally, I don't think just two websites (one of which doesn't feel all that reliable if they don't know the difference between the Grammys and the Nammys) is enough to meet the burden of GNG, and I haven't changed my mind about deleting this yet. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove citations that have useable content just because you disagree with a sentence. Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no disagreeing, just you adding a false statement and me removing it and the source which was solely supporting that statement at the time. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the notability is low-key, maybe even borderline, as most of the publications are small. But I think it passes the basic threshold. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 22:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, now I'm willing to withdraw. No clue how none of these results came up in my search but clearly there's enough here now that I'm just gonna step aside and let Netherzone handle the rest. Thanks! QuietHere (talk | contributions) 06:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.