Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaynagar Institution for Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaynagar Institution for Girls[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references just trivial and don't discuss the school in-depth. Fails NORG as well as GNG. The claim that this is one of the oldest schools in the country is not actually accurate. There are some schools which were established before the 1900's. I am happy to withdraw my nom if some one comes up with any better sources. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 06:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 06:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 06:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 06:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a search in the source given for its status as 'one of the oldest schools' returns no mention of the institution. 'significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject' entirely lacking. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I personally consider government educational institutions are more suitable to be included as relative to privately funded ones, this one seems of no significance and hence delete. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, Misses indepth coverage. Purosinaloense (talk) 09:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG, no significant coverage. Idunnox3 (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.