Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayme Karales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jayme Karales[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Prod reason was "References are not valid, as it leads to blogs. Didnt pass the WP:GNG" prod removed by IP editor without comment, so here it is at AfD. Fiddle Faddle 18:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source for press release reference seems to be valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.179.118 (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 21:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails GNG. Company PR are not RS. Caffeyw (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maintain* Press release and Thought Catalog archive prove validity/reliability in source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.190.68 (talk) 13:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Neither press releases, or links to his works are independent. They are not usable for establishing inclusion on wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 13:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the references pass Reliable Source (WP:RS). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SefBau (talk • contribs) 14:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maintain* Press release from Horror Asylum is independent source, but a regulated news website. Proves reference to pass as Reliable Source.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.190.68 (talk)
- Press releases are not an independent source no matter how many time you post that they are. -- Whpq (talk) 20:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.