Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay White (impersonator)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jay White (impersonator)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ENT and WP:GNG. It has unreliable sources. Masum Reza^📞 09:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Masum Reza^📞 09:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Some of the sources currently used are not reliable, but in the article are references from the Macomb Daily, Las Vegas Sun, and Yahoo Sports which show notability. I also easily found coverage in the Buffalo News, Waterloo Record, and ~~Daily Mail.~~ -- Whpq (talk) 18:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Daily Mail has been deprecated as RS - see here. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 23:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FoxyGrampa75: Thanks for letting me know. I've stricken the Daily Mail item. I know the tabloid is a bit sketchy but didn't know it was declared an unreliable source. -- Whpq (talk) 12:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 13:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - replacing the Daily Mail stricken above is this NBC Philedelphia item. -- Whpq (talk) 13:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I beg to differ with the nom, this guy passes both ENT and GNG based on the sources mentioned above and inside the article. Seems to be good at what he does and has been doing it long enough to get noticed. StonyBrook (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely not notable as a hockey player, but there's enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.