Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Weigel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, G12 by Ronhjones. Non-admin closure. Blueboy96 13:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jay Weigel[edit]
- Jay Weigel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possible self-bio and irrelevant to wikipedia. KzKrann (talk) 22:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, G12 Cut-and past of bio page at jaywiegel.com. Blueboy96 22:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - if the claims on the page are true, it seems to be a case of WP:SOFIXIT. I'll go and start having a look around now for sources and start wikifying the article. - ManicSpider (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The issue, though is that the article itself is a cut-and-paste copyvio--which means it has to be blown up and rewritten from scratch. Blueboy96 23:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete YOUFIXIT doesn't apply to copyvio. There's nothing to salvage here. Delete and start over would be the thing to do, except... on the evidence already there, which is presumably a complete CV, he's not notable even all claims are true. EEng (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply On the sources I can find, I am relatively certain he meets the notability standards for composers. If the article is deleted speedily at this point, may I ask that the closing admin userfy it for me and I'll fix it? I'm happy to get started on it, but these things take time to get right, and as I understand there's no deadline. - ManicSpider (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete YOUFIXIT doesn't apply to copyvio. There's nothing to salvage here. Delete and start over would be the thing to do, except... on the evidence already there, which is presumably a complete CV, he's not notable even all claims are true. EEng (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.